Year: ; Month: March; Country: UK; Customer: Unipapel; Resolution: PDF; Media: Unipapel catalogue. Download. Unipapel ID page. Unipapel media storage pockets page. Year: ; Month: March; Country: UK; Customer: Unipapel; Resolution: PDF; Media: Unipapel catalogue; European ranking , sales Mio € (1) Data corresponding to Full year for Unipapel Group and Fiscal year April April General catalogue.
|Published (Last):||26 October 2005|
|PDF File Size:||16.19 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||18.45 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Ministero delle Politiche agricole alimentari e forestali.
Mr J is ordered to pay the costs. Fei Liangchen Zhejiang, China.
ADVEO: Material Escolar, Papelería y Oficina
Official Journal of the European Union. Oude Elferink, lawyers Defendant: The General Court imposed an erroneous rule of interpretation of Community trade marks whereby if consumers within a Member State do not understand a word element of a trade mark either because it is an obscure word in another Community Language or because it is not similar to a word in their own language that element is nonetheless to be regarded as being of equal distinctiveness to a word element that they do understand and which is itself distinctive.
Gstalter, acting as Agents. Secondly it is necessary to consider the distinctive character of the marks as used.
EUR-Lex – CTOC – EN – EUR-Lex
French Referring court Tribunal administratif Parties to the main proceedings Applicant: Van den Oord, and subsequently by M. European Parliament represented by: Fetim BV Amsterdam, Netherlands represented by: English The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.
Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: The applicants submitted the requested data to the Rapporteur, who in turn evaluated it and prepared a conclusion whereby the data were sufficient to address the issue raised by EFSA.
Court of Justice of the European Union. Di Bucci and D. The applicants Mark or sign cited in opposition: Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen – Decision finding an infringement of Cxtalogo 81 EC – Imputability of the unlawful conduct – Rights of the defence uniappel Effects in relation to third parties of a judgment annulling a measure.
Maquetación editorial de Sapos y Princesas Especial 20 Escapadas
Elettronica e sistemi per automazione ELE. Caravita di Toritto, L. Upheld the opposition Decision of the Board of Appeal: By its first plea, divided into two parts, the appellant argues that the General Court infringed the principle of equal treatment and the obligation to state reasons by failing to draw any inferences from the fact that it had been penalised for the conduct of unipapfl former subsidiary, unlike Stora, which was in a similar position.
Dismisses the action; 2.
Operative part of the judgment The General Court: Kingdom of Denmark represented by: Van Maldegem, lawyers Defendant: Orders Kuwait Petroleum Corp. Gyselen, and subsequently by A. Annul the decision of the Opposition Division of 25 July ; and.
Ronkes Agerbeek, Agents, assisted initially by de L. Verschuur, and subsequently by O. EU case law Case law Digital reports Directory of case law.
EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
Pleas in law and main arguments The Commission raises a single plea unippel law in support of its action, alleging infringement of the Treaty and, in particular, of the system of attribution of the regulatory powers which the European Union legislature may attribute to the Commission pursuant to Article and TFEU.
Mustafa Yilmaz Stuttgart, Germany represented: CW Paris, France represented by: In particular, after that notification, the Member State catalogl also had to take the protective measures laid down in Article 6 2 to 4 of the directive. Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: The applicant Mark or sign cited in opposition:: Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: